Review



postf protein  (Sino Biological)


Bioz Verified Symbol Sino Biological is a verified supplier
Bioz Manufacturer Symbol Sino Biological manufactures this product  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 94

    Structured Review

    Sino Biological postf protein
    IM immunization with MF59/preF vaccine induced systemic humoral and B‐cell immune responses. (A) The schematic representation of the mouse immunization and sample collection protocol. Mice were immunized intramuscularly with PBS, MF59, preF, MF59/preF‐low, or MF59/preF‐high on Days 0, 21, and 42. Sera were collected on Days 14, 35, and 56, and BALF, spleen, lung, and ILN were harvested on day 72. (B) Endpoint titers of <t>anti‐preF/postF</t> IgG in sera from mice intramuscularly immunized with adjuvanted preF on Days 14, 35, and 56. (C) Titers of virus neutralizing antibody (VNA) <t>against</t> <t>RSV</t> A2 and RSV B in sera collected on Day 56. (D) Endpoint titers of anti‐preF/postF IgG and IgA in BALF collected on Day 72. (E–G) The representative images and quantitative analysis of preF‐specific IgG + ASCs in bone marrow (E), spleen (F), and lung (G). Data are presented as geometric mean values ± SD in B–D. The middle line indicates the median while the whisker shows the data range in E–G. n = 6 mice per group. p values were conducted by One‐way ANOVA analysis followed by Tukey's multiple comparisons test in B, and D–G. **** p < 0.0001; *** p < 0.001; ** p < 0.01; * p < 0.05; ns, not significant.
    Postf Protein, supplied by Sino Biological, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/postf protein/product/Sino Biological
    Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    postf protein - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
    94/100 stars

    Images

    1) Product Images from "Combining Intramuscular and Intranasal Immunization With the MF59‐Adjuvanted Respiratory Syncytial Virus Pre‐Fusion Protein Subunit Vaccine Induces Potent Humoral and Cellular Immune Responses in Mice"

    Article Title: Combining Intramuscular and Intranasal Immunization With the MF59‐Adjuvanted Respiratory Syncytial Virus Pre‐Fusion Protein Subunit Vaccine Induces Potent Humoral and Cellular Immune Responses in Mice

    Journal: MedComm

    doi: 10.1002/mco2.70301

    IM immunization with MF59/preF vaccine induced systemic humoral and B‐cell immune responses. (A) The schematic representation of the mouse immunization and sample collection protocol. Mice were immunized intramuscularly with PBS, MF59, preF, MF59/preF‐low, or MF59/preF‐high on Days 0, 21, and 42. Sera were collected on Days 14, 35, and 56, and BALF, spleen, lung, and ILN were harvested on day 72. (B) Endpoint titers of anti‐preF/postF IgG in sera from mice intramuscularly immunized with adjuvanted preF on Days 14, 35, and 56. (C) Titers of virus neutralizing antibody (VNA) against RSV A2 and RSV B in sera collected on Day 56. (D) Endpoint titers of anti‐preF/postF IgG and IgA in BALF collected on Day 72. (E–G) The representative images and quantitative analysis of preF‐specific IgG + ASCs in bone marrow (E), spleen (F), and lung (G). Data are presented as geometric mean values ± SD in B–D. The middle line indicates the median while the whisker shows the data range in E–G. n = 6 mice per group. p values were conducted by One‐way ANOVA analysis followed by Tukey's multiple comparisons test in B, and D–G. **** p < 0.0001; *** p < 0.001; ** p < 0.01; * p < 0.05; ns, not significant.
    Figure Legend Snippet: IM immunization with MF59/preF vaccine induced systemic humoral and B‐cell immune responses. (A) The schematic representation of the mouse immunization and sample collection protocol. Mice were immunized intramuscularly with PBS, MF59, preF, MF59/preF‐low, or MF59/preF‐high on Days 0, 21, and 42. Sera were collected on Days 14, 35, and 56, and BALF, spleen, lung, and ILN were harvested on day 72. (B) Endpoint titers of anti‐preF/postF IgG in sera from mice intramuscularly immunized with adjuvanted preF on Days 14, 35, and 56. (C) Titers of virus neutralizing antibody (VNA) against RSV A2 and RSV B in sera collected on Day 56. (D) Endpoint titers of anti‐preF/postF IgG and IgA in BALF collected on Day 72. (E–G) The representative images and quantitative analysis of preF‐specific IgG + ASCs in bone marrow (E), spleen (F), and lung (G). Data are presented as geometric mean values ± SD in B–D. The middle line indicates the median while the whisker shows the data range in E–G. n = 6 mice per group. p values were conducted by One‐way ANOVA analysis followed by Tukey's multiple comparisons test in B, and D–G. **** p < 0.0001; *** p < 0.001; ** p < 0.01; * p < 0.05; ns, not significant.

    Techniques Used: Virus, Whisker Assay

    IN immunization with MF59/preF vaccine induced local humoral and B‐cell immune responses. (A) The schematic representation of the mouse immunization and sample collection protocol. Mice were immunized intranasally with PBS, MF59, preF, MF59/preF‐low, or MF59/preF‐high on Days 0, 21, and 42. Sera were collected on Days 14, 35, and 56, and BALF, spleen, lung, and mLN were harvested on Day 72. (B) Endpoint titers of anti‐preF/postF IgG in sera from mice intranasally immunized with adjuvanted preF on Days 14, 35, and 56. (C) Titers of virus neutralizing antibody (VNA) against RSV A2 and RSV B in sera collected on Day 56. (D) Endpoint titers of anti‐preF/postF IgG and IgA in BALF collected on Day 72. (E–J) The representative images and quantitative analysis of preF‐specific IgG + (left) and IgA + (right) ASCs in bone marrow (E, H), spleen (F, I), and lung (G, J). Data are presented as geometric mean values ± SD in B–D. The middle line indicates the median while the whisker shows the data range in E–J. n = 6 mice per group. p values were conducted by One‐way ANOVA analysis followed by Tukey's multiple comparisons test in B, and D–J. **** p < 0.0001; *** p < 0.001; ** p < 0.01; * p < 0.05; ns, not significant.
    Figure Legend Snippet: IN immunization with MF59/preF vaccine induced local humoral and B‐cell immune responses. (A) The schematic representation of the mouse immunization and sample collection protocol. Mice were immunized intranasally with PBS, MF59, preF, MF59/preF‐low, or MF59/preF‐high on Days 0, 21, and 42. Sera were collected on Days 14, 35, and 56, and BALF, spleen, lung, and mLN were harvested on Day 72. (B) Endpoint titers of anti‐preF/postF IgG in sera from mice intranasally immunized with adjuvanted preF on Days 14, 35, and 56. (C) Titers of virus neutralizing antibody (VNA) against RSV A2 and RSV B in sera collected on Day 56. (D) Endpoint titers of anti‐preF/postF IgG and IgA in BALF collected on Day 72. (E–J) The representative images and quantitative analysis of preF‐specific IgG + (left) and IgA + (right) ASCs in bone marrow (E, H), spleen (F, I), and lung (G, J). Data are presented as geometric mean values ± SD in B–D. The middle line indicates the median while the whisker shows the data range in E–J. n = 6 mice per group. p values were conducted by One‐way ANOVA analysis followed by Tukey's multiple comparisons test in B, and D–J. **** p < 0.0001; *** p < 0.001; ** p < 0.01; * p < 0.05; ns, not significant.

    Techniques Used: Virus, Whisker Assay

    Combination of IM and IN immunization using MF59/preF vaccine elicited both local and systemic humoral and B‐cell immune responses. (A–B) The schematic representation of the mouse immunization and sample collection protocol. BALB/c mice received two intramuscular doses of the MF59/preF vaccine followed by a single intranasal dose (IM‐IM‐IN), or one intramuscular dose followed by two intranasal doses (IM‐IN‐IN). Sera were collected on Days 14, 35, and 56, and BALF, spleen, lung, and mLN were harvested on Day 72. (C) Endpoint titers of anti‐preF/postF IgG in sera on Day 56. (D) Titers of virus neutralizing antibody (VNA) against RSV A2 and RSV B in sera collected on Day 56. (E) Endpoint titers of anti‐preF/postF IgG and IgA in BALF collected on Day 72. (F‐K) The representative images and quantitative analysis of preF‐specific IgG + (left) and IgA + (right) ASCs in bone marrow (F, I), spleen (G, J), and lung (H, K). Data are presented as geometric mean values ± SD in C–E. The middle line indicates the median while the whisker shows the data range in F–K. n = 6 mice per group. p values were conducted by One‐way ANOVA analysis followed by Tukey's multiple comparisons test in C–K. **** p < 0.0001; *** p < 0.001; ** p < 0.01; * p < 0.05; ns, not significant.
    Figure Legend Snippet: Combination of IM and IN immunization using MF59/preF vaccine elicited both local and systemic humoral and B‐cell immune responses. (A–B) The schematic representation of the mouse immunization and sample collection protocol. BALB/c mice received two intramuscular doses of the MF59/preF vaccine followed by a single intranasal dose (IM‐IM‐IN), or one intramuscular dose followed by two intranasal doses (IM‐IN‐IN). Sera were collected on Days 14, 35, and 56, and BALF, spleen, lung, and mLN were harvested on Day 72. (C) Endpoint titers of anti‐preF/postF IgG in sera on Day 56. (D) Titers of virus neutralizing antibody (VNA) against RSV A2 and RSV B in sera collected on Day 56. (E) Endpoint titers of anti‐preF/postF IgG and IgA in BALF collected on Day 72. (F‐K) The representative images and quantitative analysis of preF‐specific IgG + (left) and IgA + (right) ASCs in bone marrow (F, I), spleen (G, J), and lung (H, K). Data are presented as geometric mean values ± SD in C–E. The middle line indicates the median while the whisker shows the data range in F–K. n = 6 mice per group. p values were conducted by One‐way ANOVA analysis followed by Tukey's multiple comparisons test in C–K. **** p < 0.0001; *** p < 0.001; ** p < 0.01; * p < 0.05; ns, not significant.

    Techniques Used: Virus, Whisker Assay



    Similar Products

    94
    Sino Biological postf protein
    IM immunization with MF59/preF vaccine induced systemic humoral and B‐cell immune responses. (A) The schematic representation of the mouse immunization and sample collection protocol. Mice were immunized intramuscularly with PBS, MF59, preF, MF59/preF‐low, or MF59/preF‐high on Days 0, 21, and 42. Sera were collected on Days 14, 35, and 56, and BALF, spleen, lung, and ILN were harvested on day 72. (B) Endpoint titers of <t>anti‐preF/postF</t> IgG in sera from mice intramuscularly immunized with adjuvanted preF on Days 14, 35, and 56. (C) Titers of virus neutralizing antibody (VNA) <t>against</t> <t>RSV</t> A2 and RSV B in sera collected on Day 56. (D) Endpoint titers of anti‐preF/postF IgG and IgA in BALF collected on Day 72. (E–G) The representative images and quantitative analysis of preF‐specific IgG + ASCs in bone marrow (E), spleen (F), and lung (G). Data are presented as geometric mean values ± SD in B–D. The middle line indicates the median while the whisker shows the data range in E–G. n = 6 mice per group. p values were conducted by One‐way ANOVA analysis followed by Tukey's multiple comparisons test in B, and D–G. **** p < 0.0001; *** p < 0.001; ** p < 0.01; * p < 0.05; ns, not significant.
    Postf Protein, supplied by Sino Biological, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/postf protein/product/Sino Biological
    Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    postf protein - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
    94/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    94
    Sino Biological postf
    Intranasal immunization with <t>the</t> <t>CCD/preF</t> vaccine induced strong antibody responses. (A) A graphical illustration of the immunization schedule. Mice were immunized intranasally with CCD/preF vaccine on days 0, 21, and 42. On days 14, 35, and 56 after the first dose, <t>postF‐</t> (B) and preF‐specific (C) IgG antibodies in the serum were evaluated with ELISA. (D) Site Ø‐specific IgG antibody titers were measured by D25‐competition ELISA. (E) preF‐specific IgG isotypes in the serum were assessed on day 56, including IgG1, IgG2a, IgG2b, and IgG2c. (F) Neutralization of the RSV A2 and B18537 strains’ infection into HEp‐2 cells by the immune sera on day 56. preF‐ and postF‐specific IgG (G) and IgA (H) titers in the BALF were determined with ELISA on day 72. n = 6. Data were displayed as mean ± SEM. P values were analyzed with One‐way ANOVA and Tukey's multiple comparison test. **** p < 0.0001, *** p < 0.001, ** p < 0.01, and * p < 0.05. ns: not significant.
    Postf, supplied by Sino Biological, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/postf/product/Sino Biological
    Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    postf - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
    94/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    Glaxo Smith onlyecto and postf protein adjuvanted with 50 µl as01 b
    A Analytical SEC trace of wildtype (gray) and stabilized OnlyEcto2P (purple) in supernatant. B SEC-MALS trace of purified OnlyEcto2P. C Melting temperature as determined by DSF of purified OnlyEcto2P of ( B ). The first derivative of the fluorescence signal is plotted. BLI using kinetic Octet with PIA174 immobilized to anti-human Fc sensors (not shown), followed subsequently by capture of purified preF variants (0−900 s phase) and association of sdAb’s 4C06 ( D ) and 4C03 ( E ) (900−1800 s phase). F SEC-MALS trace of purified <t>OnlyEcto.</t> G Melting temperature as determined of OnlyEcto as in ( C ). H Analytical SEC trace of purified OnlyEcto after storage at either 4 °C ( left panel ) or 37 °C ( right panel ) for up to 24 weeks. I Percentage trimer recovery of ( H ). Shown is the average of two replicates. J Expression and melting temperature of OnlyEcto and back-substitutions as measured by analytical SEC and DSF on crude cell supernatant.
    Onlyecto And Postf Protein Adjuvanted With 50 µl As01 B, supplied by Glaxo Smith, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/onlyecto and postf protein adjuvanted with 50 µl as01 b/product/Glaxo Smith
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    onlyecto and postf protein adjuvanted with 50 µl as01 b - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    IM immunization with MF59/preF vaccine induced systemic humoral and B‐cell immune responses. (A) The schematic representation of the mouse immunization and sample collection protocol. Mice were immunized intramuscularly with PBS, MF59, preF, MF59/preF‐low, or MF59/preF‐high on Days 0, 21, and 42. Sera were collected on Days 14, 35, and 56, and BALF, spleen, lung, and ILN were harvested on day 72. (B) Endpoint titers of anti‐preF/postF IgG in sera from mice intramuscularly immunized with adjuvanted preF on Days 14, 35, and 56. (C) Titers of virus neutralizing antibody (VNA) against RSV A2 and RSV B in sera collected on Day 56. (D) Endpoint titers of anti‐preF/postF IgG and IgA in BALF collected on Day 72. (E–G) The representative images and quantitative analysis of preF‐specific IgG + ASCs in bone marrow (E), spleen (F), and lung (G). Data are presented as geometric mean values ± SD in B–D. The middle line indicates the median while the whisker shows the data range in E–G. n = 6 mice per group. p values were conducted by One‐way ANOVA analysis followed by Tukey's multiple comparisons test in B, and D–G. **** p < 0.0001; *** p < 0.001; ** p < 0.01; * p < 0.05; ns, not significant.

    Journal: MedComm

    Article Title: Combining Intramuscular and Intranasal Immunization With the MF59‐Adjuvanted Respiratory Syncytial Virus Pre‐Fusion Protein Subunit Vaccine Induces Potent Humoral and Cellular Immune Responses in Mice

    doi: 10.1002/mco2.70301

    Figure Lengend Snippet: IM immunization with MF59/preF vaccine induced systemic humoral and B‐cell immune responses. (A) The schematic representation of the mouse immunization and sample collection protocol. Mice were immunized intramuscularly with PBS, MF59, preF, MF59/preF‐low, or MF59/preF‐high on Days 0, 21, and 42. Sera were collected on Days 14, 35, and 56, and BALF, spleen, lung, and ILN were harvested on day 72. (B) Endpoint titers of anti‐preF/postF IgG in sera from mice intramuscularly immunized with adjuvanted preF on Days 14, 35, and 56. (C) Titers of virus neutralizing antibody (VNA) against RSV A2 and RSV B in sera collected on Day 56. (D) Endpoint titers of anti‐preF/postF IgG and IgA in BALF collected on Day 72. (E–G) The representative images and quantitative analysis of preF‐specific IgG + ASCs in bone marrow (E), spleen (F), and lung (G). Data are presented as geometric mean values ± SD in B–D. The middle line indicates the median while the whisker shows the data range in E–G. n = 6 mice per group. p values were conducted by One‐way ANOVA analysis followed by Tukey's multiple comparisons test in B, and D–G. **** p < 0.0001; *** p < 0.001; ** p < 0.01; * p < 0.05; ns, not significant.

    Article Snippet: Briefly, 96‐well ELISA plates (NUNC‐MaxiSorp, Thermo Fisher Scientific) were coated overnight at 4°C with either 1 μg/mL of RSV preF or postF protein (Sino Biological, 11049‐V49H5‐B).

    Techniques: Virus, Whisker Assay

    IN immunization with MF59/preF vaccine induced local humoral and B‐cell immune responses. (A) The schematic representation of the mouse immunization and sample collection protocol. Mice were immunized intranasally with PBS, MF59, preF, MF59/preF‐low, or MF59/preF‐high on Days 0, 21, and 42. Sera were collected on Days 14, 35, and 56, and BALF, spleen, lung, and mLN were harvested on Day 72. (B) Endpoint titers of anti‐preF/postF IgG in sera from mice intranasally immunized with adjuvanted preF on Days 14, 35, and 56. (C) Titers of virus neutralizing antibody (VNA) against RSV A2 and RSV B in sera collected on Day 56. (D) Endpoint titers of anti‐preF/postF IgG and IgA in BALF collected on Day 72. (E–J) The representative images and quantitative analysis of preF‐specific IgG + (left) and IgA + (right) ASCs in bone marrow (E, H), spleen (F, I), and lung (G, J). Data are presented as geometric mean values ± SD in B–D. The middle line indicates the median while the whisker shows the data range in E–J. n = 6 mice per group. p values were conducted by One‐way ANOVA analysis followed by Tukey's multiple comparisons test in B, and D–J. **** p < 0.0001; *** p < 0.001; ** p < 0.01; * p < 0.05; ns, not significant.

    Journal: MedComm

    Article Title: Combining Intramuscular and Intranasal Immunization With the MF59‐Adjuvanted Respiratory Syncytial Virus Pre‐Fusion Protein Subunit Vaccine Induces Potent Humoral and Cellular Immune Responses in Mice

    doi: 10.1002/mco2.70301

    Figure Lengend Snippet: IN immunization with MF59/preF vaccine induced local humoral and B‐cell immune responses. (A) The schematic representation of the mouse immunization and sample collection protocol. Mice were immunized intranasally with PBS, MF59, preF, MF59/preF‐low, or MF59/preF‐high on Days 0, 21, and 42. Sera were collected on Days 14, 35, and 56, and BALF, spleen, lung, and mLN were harvested on Day 72. (B) Endpoint titers of anti‐preF/postF IgG in sera from mice intranasally immunized with adjuvanted preF on Days 14, 35, and 56. (C) Titers of virus neutralizing antibody (VNA) against RSV A2 and RSV B in sera collected on Day 56. (D) Endpoint titers of anti‐preF/postF IgG and IgA in BALF collected on Day 72. (E–J) The representative images and quantitative analysis of preF‐specific IgG + (left) and IgA + (right) ASCs in bone marrow (E, H), spleen (F, I), and lung (G, J). Data are presented as geometric mean values ± SD in B–D. The middle line indicates the median while the whisker shows the data range in E–J. n = 6 mice per group. p values were conducted by One‐way ANOVA analysis followed by Tukey's multiple comparisons test in B, and D–J. **** p < 0.0001; *** p < 0.001; ** p < 0.01; * p < 0.05; ns, not significant.

    Article Snippet: Briefly, 96‐well ELISA plates (NUNC‐MaxiSorp, Thermo Fisher Scientific) were coated overnight at 4°C with either 1 μg/mL of RSV preF or postF protein (Sino Biological, 11049‐V49H5‐B).

    Techniques: Virus, Whisker Assay

    Combination of IM and IN immunization using MF59/preF vaccine elicited both local and systemic humoral and B‐cell immune responses. (A–B) The schematic representation of the mouse immunization and sample collection protocol. BALB/c mice received two intramuscular doses of the MF59/preF vaccine followed by a single intranasal dose (IM‐IM‐IN), or one intramuscular dose followed by two intranasal doses (IM‐IN‐IN). Sera were collected on Days 14, 35, and 56, and BALF, spleen, lung, and mLN were harvested on Day 72. (C) Endpoint titers of anti‐preF/postF IgG in sera on Day 56. (D) Titers of virus neutralizing antibody (VNA) against RSV A2 and RSV B in sera collected on Day 56. (E) Endpoint titers of anti‐preF/postF IgG and IgA in BALF collected on Day 72. (F‐K) The representative images and quantitative analysis of preF‐specific IgG + (left) and IgA + (right) ASCs in bone marrow (F, I), spleen (G, J), and lung (H, K). Data are presented as geometric mean values ± SD in C–E. The middle line indicates the median while the whisker shows the data range in F–K. n = 6 mice per group. p values were conducted by One‐way ANOVA analysis followed by Tukey's multiple comparisons test in C–K. **** p < 0.0001; *** p < 0.001; ** p < 0.01; * p < 0.05; ns, not significant.

    Journal: MedComm

    Article Title: Combining Intramuscular and Intranasal Immunization With the MF59‐Adjuvanted Respiratory Syncytial Virus Pre‐Fusion Protein Subunit Vaccine Induces Potent Humoral and Cellular Immune Responses in Mice

    doi: 10.1002/mco2.70301

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Combination of IM and IN immunization using MF59/preF vaccine elicited both local and systemic humoral and B‐cell immune responses. (A–B) The schematic representation of the mouse immunization and sample collection protocol. BALB/c mice received two intramuscular doses of the MF59/preF vaccine followed by a single intranasal dose (IM‐IM‐IN), or one intramuscular dose followed by two intranasal doses (IM‐IN‐IN). Sera were collected on Days 14, 35, and 56, and BALF, spleen, lung, and mLN were harvested on Day 72. (C) Endpoint titers of anti‐preF/postF IgG in sera on Day 56. (D) Titers of virus neutralizing antibody (VNA) against RSV A2 and RSV B in sera collected on Day 56. (E) Endpoint titers of anti‐preF/postF IgG and IgA in BALF collected on Day 72. (F‐K) The representative images and quantitative analysis of preF‐specific IgG + (left) and IgA + (right) ASCs in bone marrow (F, I), spleen (G, J), and lung (H, K). Data are presented as geometric mean values ± SD in C–E. The middle line indicates the median while the whisker shows the data range in F–K. n = 6 mice per group. p values were conducted by One‐way ANOVA analysis followed by Tukey's multiple comparisons test in C–K. **** p < 0.0001; *** p < 0.001; ** p < 0.01; * p < 0.05; ns, not significant.

    Article Snippet: Briefly, 96‐well ELISA plates (NUNC‐MaxiSorp, Thermo Fisher Scientific) were coated overnight at 4°C with either 1 μg/mL of RSV preF or postF protein (Sino Biological, 11049‐V49H5‐B).

    Techniques: Virus, Whisker Assay

    Intranasal immunization with the CCD/preF vaccine induced strong antibody responses. (A) A graphical illustration of the immunization schedule. Mice were immunized intranasally with CCD/preF vaccine on days 0, 21, and 42. On days 14, 35, and 56 after the first dose, postF‐ (B) and preF‐specific (C) IgG antibodies in the serum were evaluated with ELISA. (D) Site Ø‐specific IgG antibody titers were measured by D25‐competition ELISA. (E) preF‐specific IgG isotypes in the serum were assessed on day 56, including IgG1, IgG2a, IgG2b, and IgG2c. (F) Neutralization of the RSV A2 and B18537 strains’ infection into HEp‐2 cells by the immune sera on day 56. preF‐ and postF‐specific IgG (G) and IgA (H) titers in the BALF were determined with ELISA on day 72. n = 6. Data were displayed as mean ± SEM. P values were analyzed with One‐way ANOVA and Tukey's multiple comparison test. **** p < 0.0001, *** p < 0.001, ** p < 0.01, and * p < 0.05. ns: not significant.

    Journal: MedComm

    Article Title: Intranasal Inoculation of Cationic Crosslinked Carbon Dots‐Adjuvanted Respiratory Syncytial Virus F Subunit Vaccine Elicits Mucosal and Systemic Humoral and Cellular Immunity

    doi: 10.1002/mco2.70146

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Intranasal immunization with the CCD/preF vaccine induced strong antibody responses. (A) A graphical illustration of the immunization schedule. Mice were immunized intranasally with CCD/preF vaccine on days 0, 21, and 42. On days 14, 35, and 56 after the first dose, postF‐ (B) and preF‐specific (C) IgG antibodies in the serum were evaluated with ELISA. (D) Site Ø‐specific IgG antibody titers were measured by D25‐competition ELISA. (E) preF‐specific IgG isotypes in the serum were assessed on day 56, including IgG1, IgG2a, IgG2b, and IgG2c. (F) Neutralization of the RSV A2 and B18537 strains’ infection into HEp‐2 cells by the immune sera on day 56. preF‐ and postF‐specific IgG (G) and IgA (H) titers in the BALF were determined with ELISA on day 72. n = 6. Data were displayed as mean ± SEM. P values were analyzed with One‐way ANOVA and Tukey's multiple comparison test. **** p < 0.0001, *** p < 0.001, ** p < 0.01, and * p < 0.05. ns: not significant.

    Article Snippet: preF (cat: 11049‐VNAS), Biotinylated‐preF (cat: 11049‐VNAS‐B), and postF (cat: 11049‐V08B) were obtained from SinoBiological.

    Techniques: Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay, Neutralization, Infection, Comparison

    The long‐term immune responses induced by the intranasal CCD/preF vaccine. In 1 year after the first immunization, mice sera and BALF were collected to evaluate postF‐ and preF‐specific IgG (A, B) and IgA antibodies (C) with ELISA. In 1 year, mice were sacrificed to obtain lung and BM tissues. (D) The frequency of preF‐specific MB cells, plasmablast cells, and plasma cells in the lung were evaluated using FCM. Lymphocytes from the lung and BM were isolated and re‐stimulated with F‐peptide pools for 24 h to assess preF‐specific ASCs that produce IgG and IgA antibodies (E, F) or determine the number of preF‐specific SFCs producing IFN‐γ (G) with ELISpot. Left: images of spot‐forming cells; Right: quantification of spot‐forming cells. (H) The proportion of CD4 + and CD8 + T RMs in the lung was evaluated with FCM. n = 5. Data were displayed as mean ± SD in (A–C). The middle line represents the median while the whisker shows the data range in (D–H). P values were conducted by Unpaired t ‐tests. **** p < 0.0001, *** p < 0.001, ** p < 0.01, and * p < 0.05.

    Journal: MedComm

    Article Title: Intranasal Inoculation of Cationic Crosslinked Carbon Dots‐Adjuvanted Respiratory Syncytial Virus F Subunit Vaccine Elicits Mucosal and Systemic Humoral and Cellular Immunity

    doi: 10.1002/mco2.70146

    Figure Lengend Snippet: The long‐term immune responses induced by the intranasal CCD/preF vaccine. In 1 year after the first immunization, mice sera and BALF were collected to evaluate postF‐ and preF‐specific IgG (A, B) and IgA antibodies (C) with ELISA. In 1 year, mice were sacrificed to obtain lung and BM tissues. (D) The frequency of preF‐specific MB cells, plasmablast cells, and plasma cells in the lung were evaluated using FCM. Lymphocytes from the lung and BM were isolated and re‐stimulated with F‐peptide pools for 24 h to assess preF‐specific ASCs that produce IgG and IgA antibodies (E, F) or determine the number of preF‐specific SFCs producing IFN‐γ (G) with ELISpot. Left: images of spot‐forming cells; Right: quantification of spot‐forming cells. (H) The proportion of CD4 + and CD8 + T RMs in the lung was evaluated with FCM. n = 5. Data were displayed as mean ± SD in (A–C). The middle line represents the median while the whisker shows the data range in (D–H). P values were conducted by Unpaired t ‐tests. **** p < 0.0001, *** p < 0.001, ** p < 0.01, and * p < 0.05.

    Article Snippet: preF (cat: 11049‐VNAS), Biotinylated‐preF (cat: 11049‐VNAS‐B), and postF (cat: 11049‐V08B) were obtained from SinoBiological.

    Techniques: Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay, Isolation, Enzyme-linked Immunospot, Whisker Assay

    Combining IN and IM immunization with the CCD/preF vaccine enhanced humoral immunity. (A) A graphical illustration of the immunization schedule. (B) A description of the detailed immunization protocol. Mice were vaccinated on days 0, 21, and 42 through three doses of intranasal (3×IN) or heterologous immunization (2×IM+1×IN and 1×IM+2×IN). (C) On day 56, mice sera were collected to determine preF‐ and postF‐specific IgG titers with ELISA. (D‐F) On day 72, mice were sacrificed. BALF was collected to assess endpoint titers of preF‐ and postF‐specific IgG (D) and IgA (E) antibodies with ELISA. (F) The proportion of Tfh cells in the mLN was evaluated with FCM. n = 6. Data were displayed as mean ± SD in (C–E). The middle line represents the median while the whisker shows the data range in f. P values were analyzed with One‐way ANOVA and Tukey's multiple comparison test. *** p < 0.001, ** p < 0.01, and * p < 0.05. ns: not significant.

    Journal: MedComm

    Article Title: Intranasal Inoculation of Cationic Crosslinked Carbon Dots‐Adjuvanted Respiratory Syncytial Virus F Subunit Vaccine Elicits Mucosal and Systemic Humoral and Cellular Immunity

    doi: 10.1002/mco2.70146

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Combining IN and IM immunization with the CCD/preF vaccine enhanced humoral immunity. (A) A graphical illustration of the immunization schedule. (B) A description of the detailed immunization protocol. Mice were vaccinated on days 0, 21, and 42 through three doses of intranasal (3×IN) or heterologous immunization (2×IM+1×IN and 1×IM+2×IN). (C) On day 56, mice sera were collected to determine preF‐ and postF‐specific IgG titers with ELISA. (D‐F) On day 72, mice were sacrificed. BALF was collected to assess endpoint titers of preF‐ and postF‐specific IgG (D) and IgA (E) antibodies with ELISA. (F) The proportion of Tfh cells in the mLN was evaluated with FCM. n = 6. Data were displayed as mean ± SD in (C–E). The middle line represents the median while the whisker shows the data range in f. P values were analyzed with One‐way ANOVA and Tukey's multiple comparison test. *** p < 0.001, ** p < 0.01, and * p < 0.05. ns: not significant.

    Article Snippet: preF (cat: 11049‐VNAS), Biotinylated‐preF (cat: 11049‐VNAS‐B), and postF (cat: 11049‐V08B) were obtained from SinoBiological.

    Techniques: Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay, Whisker Assay, Comparison

    A Analytical SEC trace of wildtype (gray) and stabilized OnlyEcto2P (purple) in supernatant. B SEC-MALS trace of purified OnlyEcto2P. C Melting temperature as determined by DSF of purified OnlyEcto2P of ( B ). The first derivative of the fluorescence signal is plotted. BLI using kinetic Octet with PIA174 immobilized to anti-human Fc sensors (not shown), followed subsequently by capture of purified preF variants (0−900 s phase) and association of sdAb’s 4C06 ( D ) and 4C03 ( E ) (900−1800 s phase). F SEC-MALS trace of purified OnlyEcto. G Melting temperature as determined of OnlyEcto as in ( C ). H Analytical SEC trace of purified OnlyEcto after storage at either 4 °C ( left panel ) or 37 °C ( right panel ) for up to 24 weeks. I Percentage trimer recovery of ( H ). Shown is the average of two replicates. J Expression and melting temperature of OnlyEcto and back-substitutions as measured by analytical SEC and DSF on crude cell supernatant.

    Journal: Nature Communications

    Article Title: Universal paramyxovirus vaccine design by stabilizing regions involved in structural transformation of the fusion protein

    doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-48059-w

    Figure Lengend Snippet: A Analytical SEC trace of wildtype (gray) and stabilized OnlyEcto2P (purple) in supernatant. B SEC-MALS trace of purified OnlyEcto2P. C Melting temperature as determined by DSF of purified OnlyEcto2P of ( B ). The first derivative of the fluorescence signal is plotted. BLI using kinetic Octet with PIA174 immobilized to anti-human Fc sensors (not shown), followed subsequently by capture of purified preF variants (0−900 s phase) and association of sdAb’s 4C06 ( D ) and 4C03 ( E ) (900−1800 s phase). F SEC-MALS trace of purified OnlyEcto. G Melting temperature as determined of OnlyEcto as in ( C ). H Analytical SEC trace of purified OnlyEcto after storage at either 4 °C ( left panel ) or 37 °C ( right panel ) for up to 24 weeks. I Percentage trimer recovery of ( H ). Shown is the average of two replicates. J Expression and melting temperature of OnlyEcto and back-substitutions as measured by analytical SEC and DSF on crude cell supernatant.

    Article Snippet: Female cotton rats (Sigmovir Biosystems, Inc., Rockville, MD, USA; 6–8 weeks old) were immunized intramuscularly at week 0 and week 4 with indicated doses of OnlyEcto (preF), with OnlyEcto and postF protein adjuvanted with 50 µl AS01 B (a component of Shingrix, GlaxoSmithKline, London, UK) or with OnlyEcto adjuvanted with 100 µg Alum adjuvant (AlOH, Janssen) or were intranasally exposed to live RV3 (10 4 pfu/animal, VR-93 TM; ATCC) at day 0 after which animals were challenged intranasally at week 7 with 1 × 10 5 pfu per animal of RV3 virus (VR-93 TM; ATCC).

    Techniques: Purification, Fluorescence, Expressing

    A − D Mice ( n = 5 or 8) were immunized with 15 µg adjuvanted preF or postF protein or formulation buffer (Mock) at week 0 and 4. Two weeks later, serum samples were taken and preF ( A ) and postF ( B ) binding antibody titers were measured by ELISA or virus neutralization titers (VNT) in preF, postF or Mock pooled serum samples were determined with an VNA (virus neutralization assay) on Vero cells ( C ) or on differentiated human airway epithelial cell cultures ( D ) using the RV3 JS strain equipped with a GFP reporter gene. E , F Mice ( n = 5 or 8) were immunized with a dose range of 1.5, 5 or 15 µg non-adjuvanted OnlyEcto or formulation buffer (Mock) at week 0 and 4. Two weeks later serum samples were taken and preF binding antibody titers were measured by ELISA ( E ) or RV3 neutralizing antibody titers by RV3-GFP VNA on Vero cells were determined ( F ) . G , H Mice ( n = 3 or 6) were intranasally exposed to RV3 or formulation buffer as control and immunized 19 weeks later with OnlyEcto or formulation buffer. Six weeks later, serum samples were taken and preF binding antibody titers were measured by ELISA ( G ) or RV3 neutralizing antibody titers by RV3-GFP VNA on Vero cells were determined ( H ). Analysis of variance (ANOVA; 2-sided t-test) was used for statistical comparisons between groups. Tukey-Kramer ( A , B and G , H ) or Dunnett adjustments. E , F for multiple comparisons were applied. I − L Cotton rats ( n = 5 or n = 6) were immunized with OnlyEcto with or without adjuvant or postF with adjuvant or formulation buffer (Mock) at week 0 and 4. Three weeks after the final immunization, cotton rats were challenged intranasally with RV3. Four days later viral loads in nose and lung tissue were determined ( I , J ). RV3 neutralizing antibody titers by plaque reduction neutralization test (PRNT) were determined in pre-challenge sera ( K ) and the correlation between nose viral loads and VNA titers were calculated with a spearman correlation analysis ( L ). Mean responses per group are indicated with horizontal lines. Statistical comparisons were performed across dose levels using a Tobit model ( I − L ). P < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

    Journal: Nature Communications

    Article Title: Universal paramyxovirus vaccine design by stabilizing regions involved in structural transformation of the fusion protein

    doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-48059-w

    Figure Lengend Snippet: A − D Mice ( n = 5 or 8) were immunized with 15 µg adjuvanted preF or postF protein or formulation buffer (Mock) at week 0 and 4. Two weeks later, serum samples were taken and preF ( A ) and postF ( B ) binding antibody titers were measured by ELISA or virus neutralization titers (VNT) in preF, postF or Mock pooled serum samples were determined with an VNA (virus neutralization assay) on Vero cells ( C ) or on differentiated human airway epithelial cell cultures ( D ) using the RV3 JS strain equipped with a GFP reporter gene. E , F Mice ( n = 5 or 8) were immunized with a dose range of 1.5, 5 or 15 µg non-adjuvanted OnlyEcto or formulation buffer (Mock) at week 0 and 4. Two weeks later serum samples were taken and preF binding antibody titers were measured by ELISA ( E ) or RV3 neutralizing antibody titers by RV3-GFP VNA on Vero cells were determined ( F ) . G , H Mice ( n = 3 or 6) were intranasally exposed to RV3 or formulation buffer as control and immunized 19 weeks later with OnlyEcto or formulation buffer. Six weeks later, serum samples were taken and preF binding antibody titers were measured by ELISA ( G ) or RV3 neutralizing antibody titers by RV3-GFP VNA on Vero cells were determined ( H ). Analysis of variance (ANOVA; 2-sided t-test) was used for statistical comparisons between groups. Tukey-Kramer ( A , B and G , H ) or Dunnett adjustments. E , F for multiple comparisons were applied. I − L Cotton rats ( n = 5 or n = 6) were immunized with OnlyEcto with or without adjuvant or postF with adjuvant or formulation buffer (Mock) at week 0 and 4. Three weeks after the final immunization, cotton rats were challenged intranasally with RV3. Four days later viral loads in nose and lung tissue were determined ( I , J ). RV3 neutralizing antibody titers by plaque reduction neutralization test (PRNT) were determined in pre-challenge sera ( K ) and the correlation between nose viral loads and VNA titers were calculated with a spearman correlation analysis ( L ). Mean responses per group are indicated with horizontal lines. Statistical comparisons were performed across dose levels using a Tobit model ( I − L ). P < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

    Article Snippet: Female cotton rats (Sigmovir Biosystems, Inc., Rockville, MD, USA; 6–8 weeks old) were immunized intramuscularly at week 0 and week 4 with indicated doses of OnlyEcto (preF), with OnlyEcto and postF protein adjuvanted with 50 µl AS01 B (a component of Shingrix, GlaxoSmithKline, London, UK) or with OnlyEcto adjuvanted with 100 µg Alum adjuvant (AlOH, Janssen) or were intranasally exposed to live RV3 (10 4 pfu/animal, VR-93 TM; ATCC) at day 0 after which animals were challenged intranasally at week 7 with 1 × 10 5 pfu per animal of RV3 virus (VR-93 TM; ATCC).

    Techniques: Formulation, Binding Assay, Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay, Virus, Neutralization, Adjuvant, Plaque Reduction Neutralization Test